Court Of Impeachment And War Crimes: I t's time to turn the tables and put the screws to Bush and Cheney
Loading...

Click for a full report.

Imbush Peach

An interview with Naomi Wolf about the 10 steps from democracy to dictatorship!

Stop The Spying Now

Stop the Spying!

Sunday, August 12, 2007

I t's time to turn the tables and put the screws to Bush and Cheney
















SUNDAY MORNING FROM OHIO: BREAKFAST IN DOWNTOWN KENT



MORE JUST A CLICK AWAY BELOW
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTpoo0uqGbc

EVERY POST YELLOW ROSE OF TEXAS PEACE BUS REMINDER

JANE HARMAN: WHITE HOUSE “VERY SKILLFULLY PLAYED THE FEAR CARD.”

Posted by madfloridian in General DiscussionSat Aug 11th 2007, 01:34 AM

Well, we do agree on that. However the White House has been skillfully playing the fear card since 2001.
It is time you guys stopped getting caught off guard about it. People are noticing. They are getting tired of it. Stand up there and speak up for what is right.
Playing the Fear Card

WASHINGTON, Aug. 10 — At a closed-door briefing in mid-July, senior intelligence officials startled lawmakers with some troubling news. American eavesdroppers were collecting just 25 percent of the foreign-based communications they had been receiving a few months earlier.
Behind the New Wiretapping Rules Congress needed to act quickly, intelligence officials said, to repair a dangerous situation. ..."The report helped set off a furious legislative rush last week that, improbably, broadened the administration’s authority to wiretap terrorism suspects without court oversight.

It was a surprising victory for the politically weakened White House on an issue that had plodded along in Congress for months without a clear sign of urgency or resolution. A flurry of talk in the last three weeks on intelligence gaps, heightened concern over terrorist attacks, burdensome court rulings and Congress’s recess helped turn the debate from a slow boil to a fever pitch.

The only saving grace is this article is the comment made by Russ Feingold.

There was an intentional manipulation of the facts to get this legislation through,” said Senator Russ Feingold of Wisconsin, a Democrat on the Intelligence Committee who voted against the plan.

The White House, Mr. Feingold said Friday in an interview, “has identified the one major remaining weakness in the Democratic Party, and that’s its unwillingness to stand up to the administration when it’s making a power grab regarding terrorism and national security.”
“They have figured out that all they have to do is start talking about an imminent terrorist threat, back it up against a Congressional recess, and they know the Democrats will cave,” he added.

You keep talking, Russ, and we will keep pushing until they at least try to fix it...may be too late.

THE SCORE CARD:

19 CO-SPONSORS FOR H.RES. 333 RICHARD B. CHENEY

OH KUCINICH-10
CA -Woolsey-6, Lee-9, Farr-17, Waters-35, Filner-51
GA Johnson-4
IL Schakowsky-9
MD Wynn-4
MN Ellison-5
MO Clay-1
NJ Payne-10
NY Clarke-11
PA Brady-1
TN Cohen-9
TX Jackson-Lee-18
VA Moran-8
WA McDermott-7
WI Baldwin-2

28 CO-SPONSORS FOR H.RES. 589 ALBERTO R. GONZALES

WA Inslee-1
AZ Pastor-4, Grijalva-7
CA Tauscher-10, Becerra-31
CO Perlmutter-7
GA Johnson-4
IA Braley-1
KS Moore-3
KY Chandler-6
MA McGovern-3, Frank-4
MN McCollum-4, Ellison-5
NJ Holt-12
NM Udall-3
NV Berkley-1
NY Bishop-1, Ackerman-5, Clarke-11, Maloney-14, Arcuri-24 OR Wu-1, Blumenauer-3, DeFazio-4, Hooley-5
TN Cohen-9
WI Baldwin-2

84 CITIES/COUNTIES/TOWNS WITH IMPEACHMENT RESOLUTIONS

CA: Arcata, Berkeley, Fairfax, San Francisco, Santa Cruz, Sebastopol, West Hollywood

CO Telluride

IL Urbana

MA: Amherst, Ashfield, Brookline, Buckland, Cambridge, Colrain, Heath, Charlemont, Great Barrington, Lanesborough, Leverett, Leyden, Montague, Northampton, Pelham, Rowe, Shutesbury, Stockbridge, Warwick, Wendell, Whately

MD Takoma Park

MI Detroit, Ferndale

NC Carrboro, Chapel Hill

NH Hanover

NY :Ithaca, Woodstock, Middletown, New Paltz, Nyack, Plattsburg, Tompkins County, Town of Ithaca

OH Oberlin

VT: Peru, Plainfield, Putney, Richmond, Rochester Rockingham, Roxbury, Springfield, Stannard, St. Johnsbury, Sunderland, Brattleboro, Bristol, Brookfield, Burke, Calais, Craftsbury, Dummerston, East Montpelier, Grafton, Greensboro, Guilford, Hartland, Jamaica, Jericho, Johnson, Marlboro, Middlebury, Montpelier, Montgomery, Morristown, Newbury, Newfane, Townshend, Tunbridge, Vershire, Westminster, Wilmington, Woodbury

A Word from Congressman Nadler's PredecessorOpEdNews - Newtown,PA,USAFormer Congresswoman Liz Holtzman, who served on the committee when it passed articles of impeachment against President Richard Nixon, has published a book ...See all stories on this topic

Dane County Board to vote on impeachment of Bush, CheneyWBAY - Green Bay,WI,USA(AP) - The Dane County Board will consider a resolution urging Congress to launch impeachment proceedings against President Bush and Vice President Dick ...See all stories on this topic

Impeachment supporters protest Pelosi's Stamford visitStamford Advocate - Stamford,CT,USAAbout 15 demonstrators, mostly senior citizens gathered by the Connecticut Impeachment Movement, said they were disappointed in Pelosi for not supporting US ...See all stories on this topic

Other Views: Pomeroy, Forum are wrongIn-Forum (subscription) - Fargo,ND,USA5 "Our Opinion") to the military mom who cornered Pomeroy on his failure to support presidential impeachment at this critical time in the life of our ...See all stories on this topic

County Board to vote on impeachmentThe Capital Times - Madison,WI,USAThe Dane County Board could become one of the first county boards in the country to urge Congress to start impeachment proceedings against President George ...See all stories on this topic

Ramsey Clark: "Join me in DC on Sept. 15"Bay Area Indymedia - San Francisco,CA,USAImpeachBush.org, the organization Ramsey Clark founded, and hundreds of other impeachment organizations are mobilizing with the anti-war movement for the ...See all stories on this topic

Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid are handling Impeachment perfectlyBy David Thielen Nixon did not resign because of the Democratic votes for impeachment. Nixon resigned because of the Republican votes for impeachment. It was the clearly anguished votes of people like Peter Rodino and the support for impeachment from ...Liberal and Loving It - http://www.davidthielen.info/politics/

County Board to vote on impeachment [Madison, WI}Bill Novak -- 8/11/2007 9:17 am The Dane County Board could become one of the first county boards in the country to urge Congress to start impeachment proceedings against President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney....Democratic Underground Latest... - http://www.democraticunderground.com

Impeachment Roundup - Power in NumbersBy forbodyandmind Those diaries are a fraction of 165 impeachment diaries written in that same time span. In approximately the last 4 weeks, over 650 diaries have been written by about 365 Kossacks. Granted, not all of those diaries have been ...Daily Kos - http://www.dailykos.com/section/Diary

Bill Moyers Journal: Impeachment: The Conversation ContinuesDiscussion of the history of impeachment proceedings as spurred by PBS commentator Bill Moyers. Great discussion, interesting read.digg / dig - http://digg.com/

Waxman Tells Impeachment Advocates He'll 'Keep an Open Mind'By Sister Joyous Whip of Enlightenment The conversation regarding Impeachment, the Congressman's views on same, and the arguments made by the activists in favor of it are interesting and offer some insight into both Waxman's thinking at this moment and, undoubtedly, that of ...The Open Piehole - http://akamat.wordpress.com

http://www.democraticunderground.com

Today From Thinkprogress.

Yesterday, lawyers for Guantanamo Bay detainees asked a federal judge in San Francisco to invalidate the recently-passed FISA law that lets the Bush administration conduct warrantless surveillance on suspected terrorists without first getting court-approved warrants.

"We are asking your honor, as swiftly as possible, to declare this statute unconstitutional," said Michael Avery, a lawyer for the Center for Constitutional Rights. ... "Neither Congress nor the president has the power to repeal the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirements," Avery said.

Oh boy, it's on now.

In full disclosure, I have to say that this new court move doesn't necessarily surprise me. I even wondered if this might have been part of the rationale for some Dems, when you look at what happened the last time Congress completely rolled over with the Military Commissions Act less than a year ago.

Yeah, ok, maybe that is just wishful thinking.

But following their defeat on the Hamdan V Rumsfeld case, the MCA was rushed through Congress and since then the administration has lost a major decision concerning "right " to hold someone indefinitely without charges before the 4th Circuit Appeals Court, and then two separate Military Judges ruled that the commissions have no jurisdiction to try detainees.

That's Game, Set and Match on the MCA.

So I would say that the overall track record of the Gitmo Attorneys is pretty good despite the fact the ACLU's own FISA case was thrown out since the petitioners couldn't "Prove that they had been illegally spied" upon.

Even though the plaintiffs alleged a well-founded fear that their communications were subject to illegal surveillance, the court dismissed the case because plaintiffs could not state with certainty that they had been wiretapped by the National Security Agency.

BTW how exactly do you prove that a secret government program is specifically spying on you? If they are breaking the law and hiding behind "National Security" how exactly do you catch them without committing "treason?"

But that issue isn't really a problem for the Gitmo attorney's.

In CCR v. Bush, the Center is arguing that the government’s surveillance jeopardizes its ability to represent Gitmo clients. CCR reports that it has engaged in thousands of telephone calls and e-mails with people outside the United States in the course of its representation.

The Center writes, "Given that the government has accused many of CCR’s overseas clients of being associated with Al Qaeda or of being of interest to the 9/11 investigation, there is little question that these attorneys fall within the likely range of victims of the NSA Surveillance Program."

In their case, it's not a matter of thinking their clients "might" be associated with al Qaeda - they already have been.

Anthony Coppolino, a special counsel to the Justice Department, refused to rebut the challenge to the new law. Copppolino offered this defense: "It’s possible that their clients were and it’s possible that their clients were not" spied on.

With the previous decision by Federal Judge Ann Diggs Taylor that the NSA program as it existed was clearly and obviously illegal and violated the 1st and 4th Amendments already on the books, this decision shouldn't be a difficult one. And Judge Taylor wasn't alone.

A separate federal district court in San Francisco had previously rejected the administration’s argument that the courts could not hear the case due to a "state secrets" privilege.

Taken together these previous decisions lay a road map that just might not take that long for DC Circuit Judge Vaughn Walker to navigate and immediately bring the implementation of this new FISA law to a screeching halt.

But then again, it might take some time. Either way, I'm optimistic - very optimistic.

The right wing will of course attempt to spin this into Dems "Not having the stomach to fight the war on Terror" but we have to push back and point out that this isn't about not wanting to listen to terrorists, it's about protecting innocent people from having their lives intruded upon and being mistakenly caught up in the terror web as people such as Maher Arar and Abu Omar have. Both of whom were innocent, yet mistakenly detained, then rendered to foreign a government where they were tortured. Or AP photographer Bilal Hussein whose been held by U.S. Forces in Iraq for months without explanation or charges just like the other 14,000 people that the U.S. is holding worldwide as "Security Threats."

If they are guilty of something - charge them and prove it in a regularly convened court - otherwise let 'em go.

Although Mitt Romney might be unaware of it, surprise - surprise, we already have been going into friendly countries without their permission and knowledge and snatching people up. (That's what happened to Omar and the Italian government now has warrants issued for 19 members of the CIA "Grab Team" who did it) At a certain point we really need to make sure these are the right people, and that the wrong people - the rest of us - are reasonable protected from being illegally and unconstitutionally spied upon or mistakenly suffering this fate.
Vyan

No comments: