Trading Impeachment Punches...Bush and Cheney Going Down For The Count!

THE PUNCHES ARE STARTING TO LAND

In an unprecedented action, the ANSWER Coalition today received citations fining the organization $10,000 for the placement of posters announcing the September 15 March on Washington DC.

The fines come after a campaign led by FOX news calling for the DC government to take action against those putting up posters for the September 15 demonstration.

They have told us that we have 72 hours to remove every poster, or the fines will go into effect.

Tens of thousands of dollars in additional fines are expected in the coming days. Bush’s Interior Department is threatening similar actions against ANSWER.

The September 15 posters are legal and conform to city regulations. We will not allow the government's intimidation tactics to slow our outreach or silence the antiwar movement.

We can stop this effort to repress the antiwar movement with your help.

This is part of a systematic effort to disrupt the organizing for the September 15 Mass March that is timed to coincide with the report of General Petraeus and the debate in Congress on the Iraq war.

Iraq war veterans and their families will lead this dramatic march from the White House to the Congress on September 15. The last thing the government wants is to see the streets of Washington DC fill up with throngs of anti-war protesters right in the middle of the debate.

But we will not be stopped.

Organizing for this demonstration is taking place in cities and towns throughout the country. Buses and car caravans are coming from 90 cities and towns.

Please send a letter today to Washington DC Mayor (Adrian M. Fenty) and to the Director of DC Department of Public Works (William O. Howland, Jr.) demanding an end to the fines, harassment and repression of the anti-war movement. We have a right to publicize the September 15 March. Fining the anti-war movement tens of thousands of dollars for putting up Free Speech-protected literature makes a mockery out of the First Amendment.

Take Action!

The best way to take action is to call the Director of Department of Public Works, William O. Howland, Jr. at 202-673-6833, and the Mayor of DC, Adrian Fenty, at 202-724-8876. You can also send a letter or fax by clicking this link.

We'd suggest saying something along the lines of: "I am writing to protest the fines levied against the ANSWER Coalition for putting up posters for the September 15th March on Washington. The government does not fine politicians who put up campaign posters, or commercial and business interests that plaster Washington, DC with posters. It is outrageous that the city, in concert with FOXNews, are attempting to suppress the antiwar movement. Stop the harassment. Stop the fines."

Let us know how your phone conversations go email us at:
http://us.f368.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=info@internationalanswer.org
A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalitionhttp://www.answercoalition.org/info@internationalanswer.org

National Office in Washington DC: 202-544-3389New York City: 212-694-8720Los Angeles: 213-251-1025 San Francisco: 415-821-6545Chicago: 773-463-0311

Hungry for end to war, activists seek impeachment of Bush, CheneySan Francisco Chronicle - CA, USA... the protest to call for an immediate end to the war in Iraq and immediate impeachment proceedings against President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney. ...See all stories on this topic

More on Conyers from Mark SolomonAmerican Chronicle - Beverly Hills,CA,USALennox Yearwood (one of the sit-in protesters) noted: Conyers and his staff "wrote the book" on impeachment. With that awareness, one can reasonably ...See all stories on this topic

Congress: Bottleneck to impeachmentOpEdNews - Newtown,PA,USABy taking impeachment "off the table", Nancy Pelosi and the Democratic power structure are abetting the formation of dictatorship and the shredding of the ...See all stories on this topic

Where Congressman Jerrold Nadler Stands on ImpeachmentAmerican Chronicle - Beverly Hills,CA,USANadler chairs the subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee to which the bills for the impeachment of Cheney and Gonzales have been sent. Rep. ...See all stories on this topic

Dennis Desaparecido!OpEdNews - Newtown,PA,USAThe same is true on the issue of impeachment. The Times has only twice mentioned the bill, H Res 333, for the impeachment of Vice President Dick Cheney, ...See all stories on this topic

Hungry for end to war, activists seek impeachment of Bush, Cheney ...By San Francisco Chronicle She joined a crowd of about 100 demonstrators dressed in hot pink hats, shirts and scarves and fought the wind to raise her sign: "Impeach Bush and Cheney!" "My arms are aching, but I'm getting energy from the drivers - so many are ...News/Activism - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/browse

Co-Editor of American Prospect Calls for Impeachment of Gonzales ...For several months, I have been arguing with friends and colleagues that impeachment of President Bush and Vice President Cheney should be a serious political option. Just two of their crimes and misdemeanors -- willfully lying America...AfterDowningStreet.org - Impeach... - http://www.afterdowningstreet.org

Hungry for end to war, activists seek impeachment of Bush, CheneyBy rider87 Marghi Dutton is 90 and losing her eyesight, but nothing was going to stop her from trekking to midspan of the Golden Gate Bridge on Sunday with the anti-war group Code Pink: Women for Peace. Channel: News Tags:Netscape.com News Stories - http://www.netscape.com

Nichols on The Danger of Leaving Impeachment "off the table"According to John Nichols, Americans have waken to the need to hold George W. Bush and Dick Cheney accountable for the gross abuses of power while in office, before they leave a legacy from which our government may never recover. ...John Edwards '08 Blog: Arguments... - http://blog.johnedwards.com/section/arguments_analysis

Impeachment: AZ Press EscA for Attorneys - Firing them; B for Bill of Rights - Shredding it; C for Constitution - Not upholding it; D for Dollar - taking it to the brink of collapse; E for EEVS - Homeland Security's "No work list"; F for Fear Tactics - Using ...digg / dig - http://digg.com/

Fast track

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department is putting the final touches on regulations that could give Atty. Gen. Alberto R. Gonzales important new sway over death penalty cases in California and other states, including the power to shorten the time that death row inmates have to appeal convictions to federal courts.

The rules implement a little-noticed provision in last year's reauthorization of the Patriot Act that gives the attorney general the power to decide whether individual states are providing adequate counsel for defendants in death penalty cases.

The authority has been held by federal judges.Under the rules now being prepared, if a state requested it and Gonzales agreed, prosecutors could use "fast track" procedures that could shave years off the time that a death row inmate has to appeal to the federal courts after conviction in a state court.

The move to shorten the appeals process and effectively speed up executions comes at a time of growing national concern about the fairness of the death penalty, underscored by the use of DNA testing to establish the innocence of more than a dozen death row inmates in recent years.Amid the public debate, the number of people executed in the U.S. has declined steadily since the mid-1990s.

California and several other states have moratoriums on lethal injections, stemming from legal challenges. Opponents say the way the states administer a three-drug lethal cocktail unnecessarily risks excessive pain for the inmate and therefore violates the constitutional bar against cruel and unusual punishment.

A federal judge in San Jose, citing a lack of training and supervision of the execution team, ruled California's application of lethal injections unconstitutional. State officials have proposed changing procedures to try to address the judge's concerns. A hearing is in October.

Prosecutors say many death penalty cases take far too long to resolve even when the issue of guilt is clear. Especially in the West, where the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco has blocked many executions, cases can take decades to wind through the courts. In its most recent term, the U.S. Supreme Court restored the death penalty in three cases in which the 9th Circuit had reversed the sentence.

One of the cases involved a two-time Arizona murderer who told the sentencing judge: "If you want to give me the death penalty, just bring it right on." He was sentenced in 1990.Some Arizona officials say the new procedures are long overdue. "If you are going to have the death penalty at all, it shouldn't take 20 to 25 years," said Kent Cattani, the chief capital litigation counsel in the Arizona attorney general's office.

"Either get rid of it altogether, or try to have a good system in state courts and then accelerate it through the federal courts."On the other side, advocates for death row inmates and some legal experts say the rules would make a bad system worse."It is another means by which people are determined to shut the federal courts down to meaningful review of death penalty cases," said Elisabeth Semel, director of the Death Penalty Clinic at the UC Berkeley law school.

"The inevitable result of speeding them up is to miss profound legal errors that are made. Lawyers will not see them. Courts will not address them.""This is the Bush administration throwing down the gauntlet and saying, 'We are going to speed up executions,' " said Kathryn Kase, a Houston lawyer and co-chair of the death-penalty committee for the National Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers.

About 3,350 people are on death row in the U.S., including more than 600 in California. Most were sentenced in state courts, but death cases almost always end up being reviewed by federal judges too.It is impossible to estimate how many inmates might be affected. Some with appeals pending could see their cases shortened."Cases in the system for 20 years in federal court, it will not affect those," said Cattani. But "it will prevent those from happening in the future.

"The procedures would cut to six months, instead of a year, the time that death row inmates have to file federal appeals once their cases have been resolved in the state courts.It would also impose strict guidelines on federal judges for deciding such inmates' petitions. Federal district judges would have 450 days, appeals courts 120 days. Proponents say that would prevent foot-dragging by liberal judges.The costs associated with the death penalty have also been a growing concern to some states. California, for example, spends $90,000 more a year on housing a death row inmate than an inmate in the general prison population — adding up to $57.5 million annually — according to a 2005 study by The Times.

The idea behind the new rules has been years in the making. The federal Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 set up a system in which states could take advantage of faster procedures so long as they could prove they had made sure defendants had had adequate counsel in state courts. California and several other states applied to the program starting in the late 1990s. But federal courts ruled that they were not doing enough to provide defendants with competent attorneys.

Frustrated with the pace of changes — and believing that judges were part of the problem — death penalty advocates Rep. Dan Lungren (R-Gold River) and Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) led a successful effort to include language in the Patriot Act last year that let the attorney general, rather than judges, decide whether states were ensuring death row inmates had adequate legal representation.

Under the law, the attorney general's decision could be challenged before the federal appeals court in Washington.

Justice Department officials are seeking public comment on the rules until Sept. 23, after which they will be finalized "as quickly as circumstances allow," said department spokesman Erik Ablin.Some critics question whether the rules would have the desired effect. The rules would require that states establish a "mechanism" for supplying lawyers to death row inmates in order to qualify for the expedited procedures but would not ensure that the lawyers were competent or adequately funded, these critics say.

Arizona and California have state-supported programs that aid defense counsel in capital cases, but there are still not enough lawyers to go around.

And funding for legal bills and other expenses is far from adequate, lawyers for death row inmates say."If you are going to impose the kind of incredibly stringent deadlines that this statute imposes . . . you need to ensure people get adequate representation throughout the state process," said Robert Litt, a former Justice Department official representing the American Bar Assn. in the rule-making dispute. "This is the opportunity that the Department of Justice has missed.

"He said: "Without a set of standards to guide the attorney general, there is a tremendous potential for arbitrariness here, and to put a thumb on the scales on the side of the states."The Judicial Conference of the U.S., the policy-making arm of the federal courts, also sees problems.States might be able to qualify even if they had not provided lawyer services "sufficient to enable federal court litigation to proceed fairly within the expedited time period," the group said in a letter to the Justice Department this month.

Critics also say there is a major conflict of interest for the nation's top law enforcement officer to judge the qualifications of lawyers defending people whom government officials are seeking to put to death.Others have doubts about giving Gonzales in particular more power. His judgment has been challenged over his handling of the firing of eight U.S. attorneys last year, among other matters.Death penalty foes also say his record on the issue inspires no confidence that the rules will be administered fairly.

As legal advisor to then-Texas Gov. George Bush in the 1990s, he gave what many saw as cursory treatment of clemency petitions of capital defendants whom the state subsequently put to death."It is almost a cruel joke for Congress to have said, 'What we would like to do is improve the way states handle these' . . . and then put it in the hands of, all people, the attorney general," said Lawrence Fox, a Philadelphia lawyer who teaches legal ethics at the University of Pennsylvania Law School. "It really is quite extraordinary.

He is the chief prosecutor of the United States. He couldn't possibly be unbiased."Fox said he would have problems with any attorney general wielding that power.

Under the proposed rules, each state, through its attorney general, would have to apply to the Justice Department to be included in the program.Besides Arizona, where 114 prisoners are on death row, Texas, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania and other states have shown interest in the new procedures.It's unclear whether California would apply. Atty. Gen. Jerry Brown is an avowed opponent of the death penalty, but many staff attorneys support the rule, and Brown has said he will not allow his personal feelings to affect his judgment about enforcing the law.rick.schmitt@latimes.comTimes staff writer Henry Weinstein in Los Angeles contributed to this report.

'Architect' Envisioned GOP Supremacy President Bush once nicknamed him "The Architect," heaping gratitude on his chief strategist for helping engineer two presidential victories and two cycles of congressional triumphs. (By Anne E. Kornblut and Michael D. Shear, The Washington Post)

Lawsuits May Illuminate Methods of Spy Program

By Dan Eggen
Washington Post Staff WriterTuesday, August 14, 2007; Page A01

In 2003, Room 641A of a large telecommunications building in downtown San Francisco was filled with powerful data-mining equipment for a "special job" by the National Security Agency, according to a former AT&T technician. It was fed by fiber-optic cables that siphoned copies of e-mails and other online traffic from one of the largest Internet hubs in the United States, the former employee says in court filings.

What occurred in the room is now at the center of a pivotal legal battle in a federal appeals court over the Bush administration's controversial spying program, including the monitoring that came to be publicly known as the Terrorist Surveillance Program.
I love the smell of supoenas in the morning. It's the smell of victory.

Leahy wants meeting with Bush on aide testimony

By Klaus Marre
August 14, 2007
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), at the urging of the panel's ranking member, Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), on Tuesday requested a meeting with President Bush to hammer out a deal that would allow key White House aides to testify before the panel on the firing of several U.S. attorneys.

Leahy indicated that this is a last-ditch effort, saying that his previous efforts to get the White House to cooperate have failed to yield results.

"The stonewalling leaves me and the Senate Judiciary Committee with few options other than considering citations for contempt of Congress against those who have refused to provide relevant testimony and documents to the Congress," he said.

Leahy noted that Specter, who is unhappy with the conditions the White House wants to place on testimony from top aides but has been seeking to reach a compromise, urged him to contact the president directly.

While Democrats want the aides to testify as any other witness would, White House Counsel Fred Fielding has made a "take it or leave it" offer that would place severe restrictions on any such testimony. The administration does not want the staffers to be placed under oath and said there should be no transcript of the conversation between the lawmakers and the White House aides.

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/leahy-wants-meeting-with-bush-on-testimony-2007-08-14.html

See Previous Post Re: Fielding
http://courtofimpeachmentandwarcrimes.blogspot.com/2007/03/impeachment-bush-administration-setting.html